Islam Religion Of Peace Or War Essay - 1445 Words

Islam a Religion of Peace or War Introduction: After the crisis of 9/11, the religion of Islam has raised a number of controversies. More specifically, the issue of Islam as a harmonious religion or not. In the last fifteen years, after 9/11, there has been multiple disputes among those believing Islam as a religion of peace, and those who believe otherwise. With any debate, numerous questions spring up to force the majority to believe their beliefs are the truth. Some of the questions or disagreements are as follows: What is Islam and what does it signify? Does Islam promote violence and terrorism? What is the Islamic view of terrorism? What does the Quran say about war? Is there anything in Islam that leads to suicide bombings or terrorism? Was America attacked by Muslims on 9/11? Where are the Muslim peacemakers? What is Jihad? Do Muslims support Al-Qaeda? Did Muslims support bin Laden when he was alive? In Islam, is it ever justifiable to kill innocent civilians? Why is there a considerable amount of conflict between Muslims and Jews? If Islam is considered to be a religion of peace, why is there a large group of conflict between Muslims? With various more questions to keep in mind, knowing additional facts about this controversy, can be of use to identify and make a stronger, more informed choice of Islam as a religion of peace or a religion of war. Timeline and Vocabulary of Controversy: There are many events that lead to the popular question of Islam as aShow MoreRelatedThe Middle East1289 Words   |  6 Pagesthe variety of cultures. There are three major religious based out of the middle east, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Why do these religions have such a rift between them, if their principles are similar? All three of the religions have similar qualities, and many differences, but is that still a reason to compete with each other the way that they do? Christianity, Judaism, and Islam all pray to one God, recognize Jesus Christ,share the Old Testament and carry Holy books. They share a commonRead MoreEssay on The Terrorists Attack on the World Trade Centre in New York1205 Words   |  5 Pagesabout Islam and Muslims. Moreover, Islamic concept â€Å"Jihad† is criticized and it is questioned among Non-Muslims. 9/11 attack not only effects non-Muslims but also the Muslims who have no connections with the terrorist groups. As well as they do not support these terrorism. These Muslims face the hatred of the non-western people. They feel guilty about the Sin, they neither commit nor support. After 9/11, The Muslims all over the world called as terrorist and Islam is considered as religion whichRead MoreThe Encounter Between War And Religion932 Words   |  4 PagesThe Encounter between War and Religion Religion has always been the central worldview of traditional civilizations. For most of these civilizations, religion explains existence and ethical thinking for governments. Each religion mentioned wages war according to their principals and beliefs in order to gain power over another. Also, they each have their own view for when war is considered just or unjust. Focusing on Christianity, Islamic, and Buddhism religions and their understanding of warfareRead MoreThe Teachings of Islam653 Words   |  3 Pagesabout Islam, I’m pretty sure you have. People say that Islam tells you have to live your life, but really Islam tells you much more, like how to be nice to people, and what you get for being nice. It teaches you how to be a good person and stay away from bad things. Islam is the most fastest growing religion on the face of the earth. The word Islam means voluntary â€Å"Submission† or â€Å"Surrender† to the Will of God. It derives from the root word â€Å"salam,† meaning peace. A person who follows Islam is aRead MoreWhat Role Did Violence And Warfare Play During The Origins And The Rise Of Islam1078 Words   |  5 PagesFirst of all, we are talking about what role did violence and warfare play in the origins and the rise of Islam. Since the 1950s, Western countries led by the committee to allow the establishment of Islamic mullahs called on the community of believers. Freed from the oppression of Islam out of the only parts of the land has old Yugoslavia and modern Israel. The real windfall rooted in Islamic fundamentalism and religious revivalism, part of the Muslim Arab countries because the current situationRead MoreJihad Is A Symbol Of Destruction And Terrorism909 Words   |  4 PagesArguably the most misunderstood term in the religion of Islam, Jihad could mean one of two things: a struggle for or against something or a Holy War against a nation. The idea of Jihad came about when Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), most praised and recognized Prophet of Islam, wanted to spread Islam. Today, Jihad is a symbol of destruction and terrorism. It is frequently seen in the headlines of Western media as a demeaning term meaning an all-out explosive battle has been ensuing betweenRead MoreTerrorism, I Am A Muslim And I Am Against It1461 Words   |  6 Pagestheir Lord. They have nothing to fear, nor will they grieve† This is how Islam inculcates Muslims not to judge others, because obviously it’s the Lord who does that. Despite this verse and many other verses in Quran which promote for peace and love among humans, still people combine Islam with terror. I have seen many false allegations about Islam in the media. All that made me wonder, did I understand my religion wrong? What really interests me is whenever I look for the word terror on theRead MoreThe Islamic View On Self Harm And Suicide Attacks1298 Words   |  6 Pages There is no issue in this contemporary world that is more misinterpreted than that of Islam and its views on terrorism and violence. If suicide and self harm are forbidden in Islam, why do Islamic terrorists conduct and take part in suicide bombings? Fighting in a war in a way is suicide because the fighter knows that he or she may be killed. If suicide and self harm are sins in Islam, why are jihad and war not sins? There are many approaches that can be taken to clarify these misinterpretationsRead MoreIslam and Jihad Essay1185 Words   |  5 Pagesholy struggle. It is not holy war. War is war. No war can be holy. The blood of humans is holy and sacred. The Quran says unjust killing of one man means the killing of the whole mankind. What is just killing and what is unjust killing. When some body kills a man without any reason or justification it is unjust killing. When the judge gives the capital punishment to this murderer and issues the order of his death, it is a just killing. Similarly, when a war is thrust upon you and you becomeRead MoreThe Positive and Negative Impact of the Portrayal of Religion1108 Words   |  4 PagesThe portrayal of religion has had both a negative and positive impact. When people hear about religion, they either cringe at the fact of following outdated rules and norms, or issues that deal with politics and the media. The two most popular religions, Islam and Christianity, must be analysed to identify what religion is. While further examining these closely, a finite argument can be made that religion is unfavourable for the modern society. Our society holds the key main ingredients to the

Analysis Of Northrop Frye s The Educated Imagination

Northrop Frye s the Educated Imagination, published in 1963, attempts to bring out the meaning and effect of possessing an educated imagination in contrast to its opposite. Dr. Frye analyses how his theory advances society’s interests and overcomes its limits through the three levels of the human mind. In his essay, the three levels are broken down in a detailed manner, which links it directly its thesis. Frye presents definitive answers to his questions in the beginning of his essay, â€Å"What good is the study of literature? Does it help us to think more clearly, or feel more sensitively, or live a better life than we could without it?† Conclusively, the education of an individual’s mind is critical to understand the world we live in and to the advancement of our society. Educating the mind consists of absorbing and modifying literature, understanding and evolving art, and placing science within context without having data as the boundaries of our imagination. Unlike Socrates, Frye believes that the written word is fundamental, even critical, for the advancement of society and its members to express their most inner thoughts, beliefs and ideas in which the verbal system of communication is incapable of capturing. As he mentions, â€Å"there s the level of imagination, which produces the literary language of poems and plays and novels.† (p. 8) Which is a clear contrast to the â€Å"technological language of teachers and preachers and politicians and advertisers and lawyers andShow MoreRelatedThe Glorious Faculty: a Critical Analysis of Addison’s Theory of Imagination in ‘the Pleasures of Imagination’2701 Words   |  11 PagesThe Glorious Faculty: A Critical Analysis of Addison’s Theory of Imagination in ‘The Pleasures of Imagination’ Declaration: I declare that this is my original work and I have acknowledged indebtedness to authors I have consulted in the preparation of my paper. (I) An auxilier light Came from my mind which on the setting sun Bestow’d new splendor †¦[1] - William Wordsworth (II) Ah ! from the soul itself must issue forth ARead MoreKhasak14018 Words   |  57 PagesMonday, 26 October 2009 Preface This dissertation titled ART AS A RENDEZVOUS OF MYTH AND MIND: A PSYCHOANALYTIC AND MYTHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF O V VIJAYAN’S THE LEGENDS OF KHASAK explores how the judicious selection and use of literary theory can account for the universal appeal of The Legends of Khasak, a belated self translated rendering of a famous regional work in Malayalam, Khasakkinte Ithihasam authored by the eminent writer O V Vijayan, and thus assert its artistic value. Divided into fourRead MoreCleanth Brookss Essay Irony as a Principle of Structure9125 Words   |  37 PagesMarx’s economic theories as such: we shall confine our discussion to their methodological premises and implications. It will in any case be obvious to the reader that the present writer upholds the validity of their content. Secondly, a detailed analysis of Rosa Luxemburg’s thought is necessary because its seminal discoveries no less than its errors have had a decisive influence on the theories of Marxists outside Russia, above all in Germany. To some extent this influence persists to this day. ForRead MoreThe Analysis of the Mythic Dimension in ‘a Streetcar Named Desired’6094 Words   |  25 PagesThe Analysis of the Mythic dimension in ‘A Streetcar Named Desired’ Background This paper tells about American South which exposed in A Streetcar Named Desire written by Tennesse Williams. The changes were drawn from the life experience of the main characters in the play, named Blanche Du Bois. Here, we try to explore about the analysis of the main character, Blanch Du Bois. Problem and its Scope This study principally constitus the analyze of the myth in a play that written by Tennese WilliamRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pagesand permission should be obtained from the publisher prior to any prohibited reproduction, storage in a retrieval system, or transmission in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or likewise. To obtain permission(s) to use material from this work, please submit a written request to Pearson Education, Inc., Permissions Department, One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458, or you may fax your request to 201-236-3290. Many of the designations by manufacturers

The Hart vs Devlin Debate free essay sample

This essay will seek to examine the contention that should the Government introduce a minimum price for alcohol and other measures, such as restricting multi-buy offers in shops and off-licences and promotions in bars, in an effort to reduce the nation’s consumption of alcohol, in particular binge drinking? Of particular interest in this area is the fascinating debate between H. L. A. Hart and Sir Patrick Devlin sparked by the publication of the Wolfenden Report on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution. Their analysis of the desirability of regulating morality is a vital addition to any consideration of this question and will form a large part of my enquiry. The renowned and much analysed  Hart v Devlin debate  on the legal enforcement of morality saw its origins in the publication of the Report of the Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution (hereafter referred to as the Wolfenden Report). The committee concluded that unless society made desirable attempts to lawfully equate the sphere of crimes in private morality which is separate from law will be exposed. However this did not encourage pubic immorality rather homosexual behaviour between adults who consented should no longer be a criminal offence under Sexual Offences Act 1957. Nonetheless two years later Lord Devlin  criticised this report in his book the ‘The Enforcement of Morals’. Professor Hart  supported the general proposal of this report and attacked Devlin’s argument. Devlin wrote and published The Enforcement of Morals, in which he argues that morality is part of the fabric of society and that immoral conduct therefore presents a clear threat, the neutralisation of which takes precedence over individual freedom. â€Å"Devlin argued that one of the essential elements of a society is a shared morality. †The maximum individual freedom that is consistent with the integrity of society should be determined based on the intolerance, indignation and disgust of ordinary people. This viewpoint has been co-opted by religious and other strongly conservative groups campaigning against binge drinking and cheap sale of alcohol. He argued that the policing of vice e. g. alcoholism is as important a function  of the law as the policing of subversive activities. Devlin contended that it is as difficult to delineate the realm of private morality as it is to ascertain one relating to private subversive activity. He submitted that an acknowledged moral code is as necessary to society’s existence as a recognised government and that its maintenance is equally important. Hence, he argued that one who is no apparent menace to others may, by his immoral conduct, jeopardise part of the moral establishment on which society is based. Given that every society is entitled to preserve its own existence, he submitted that it follows that it has the right to employ the institution of the criminal law and its sanctions to enforce that objective. Lord Devlin postulated the test that every moral judgment should be determined on the fundamental basis that no right-minded man could act in any other way without admitting that he was doing wrong. Such a question should be left to the judgment of a jury of peers, where the decision could be left to a matter of feeling and conscience. His Lordship thereafter attempted to set in place a threshold for the intervention of the criminal law. He argued that the law was entitled to intervene to address behaviour that aroused feelings of indignation and disgust in society. H. L. A. Hart, a confirmed and dedicated positivist and liberal, disagreed with Devlin in Law, Liberty and Morality, published in 1963. He argues against fixing the morality of a society by cementing it in place with law, since morality is a social standard which changes as the society changes and develops, consistent not only with the preservation of society but with its advance. â€Å"The problem is that beliefs about moral matters change. † This is not something which must be maintained in the interests of societal integrity but which must be allowed to modulate as society does. He observed It seems fatally easy to believe that loyalty to democratic principles entails acceptance of what may be termed moral populism: The view that the majority have a moral right to dictate how all should live. This is a misunderstanding of democracy which still menaces individual liberty. † Hart argues that the theories put forward by Devlin are unsustainable. Devlin is mistaken because he gave no evidence that enforcing morality is required to preserve a society. Hart does not argue that members of civil society should not follow moral standards but he believes this can be best achieved by discussion, advice and debates rather than law. Using the law as weapon to secure moral standards through fear of punishment symbolises the condemnation and social insult of departing from moral values. â€Å"Hart’s theory of law does not give a central role to sanctions. †The price of seeking to impose moral value by legal sanction in terms of punishment in turn results to loss of freedom. Furthermore, in his (classically liberal) view there is a distinction to be drawn, the offence caused by immoral acts taking place in public and being witnessed by others, and that caused by the knowledge that immoral conduct takes place in private. This is identifiable as a direct descendant of Mills harm principle; that harm to others can and should be regulated, but that the law should not intervene to regulate the private acts of individuals which harm only themselves. However, the key problem with the harm principle has always been that it requires a line to be drawn between what causes harm and should be regulated, and what merely attracts disapproval and rightly belongs to the freedom permitted to the individual in liberal law systems. Applied to the cheap sale of alcohol this problem becomes crucial while proven harm caused by binge drinking would be a strong case under the harm principle for strict regulation, there is an inescapable difficulty in evaluating the harm it causes in a meaningful manner. In relation to the question presented of whether or not the government should introduce a minimum price for alcohol and other measures, such as restricting multi-buy offers in shops and off-licences and promotions in bars, in an effort to reduce the nation’s consumption of alcohol, in particular binge drinking, Devlin, judging by his observations would very much answer yes as it would cut the number of days lost in absenteeism; it would also cut hospital admissions and alcohol-related crimes as well as saving money thereby benefiting and upholding the morals of society as binge drinkers can be seen as a threat to social order. Professor Martin Plant an expert witness told the health select committee that â€Å"supermarkets are exhibiting the morality of a crack dealer† he also stated bluntly â€Å"Cheap alcohol kills people. † Hart who is totally on the other side of the moral spectrum to Devlin would answer no to the question based on his argument that the law should not be used as a weapon, trying to cut the nation’s alcohol consumption through the means of increasing its price etc. would serve to go against the very nature of a democratic society. In conclusion, while I cannot agree with Devlins conservative and religiously inspired stance, I can see that his wider view on the social cost of such activity is one which bears reconsideration. We need to set aside established principles for a moment and try to think of new ways to look at the notion of harm, and perhaps more crucially, the notion of victim. The modern polemic relating to ‘political correctness’ and nagging fears concerning the activities of the so-called ‘nanny state’ and ‘thought police’ is relevant in this context and adds some weight to the argument that law and private morality should be distinguished.  Ultimately the question is a quintessentially personal one and a democratic society can only arrive at an answer by ascertaining a general consensus of individual opinions on the issue I. e. the cheap sale of alcohol and binge drinking in this case.